linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: C Anthony Risinger <anthony@extof.me>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow link/Capacity changed + Kernel OOPS... possible hardware issues, ideas?
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:53:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101008145319.GK4804@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikcaAFvosjpnZpG9Rp8C1Q+nqb1=Uaftyzh5fXp@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:07:47PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> well after recently talking about how i haven't had any problems with
> btrfs on several machines for ~1.5yrs...
>=20
> it happens :-(
>=20
> ) 2.6.35 kernel
> ) btrfs on partition 2 of sda
> ) no special mkfs or mount options used (except ssd)
>=20
> my fianc=E9's EEE S101 netbook, w/SSD, is failing hard.  when booting
> normally (subvol=3D__active), no special boot options, it hangs at
> udev... it all started today, when it suddenly froze during normal
> use, and i was forced to hard power off.  it hasn't started up
> correctly since.  using an Archlinux rescue usb disk (archboot), i
> tried to tar + ssh backup the system to another machine (i can still
> mount the btrfs disk); i tried a couple times, and it always transfer=
s
> ~1.3MB then pukes.  the last time i managed to get the kernel log
> somehow, as it didn't lockup...
>=20
> can anyone point me in the right direction?  it looks like maybe the
> SSD is failing to me (all the "slow link" and "capacity changed to 0"
> stuff), but i really don't know.  i knew there was a reason they were
> selling these things cheap on Newegg!!!
>=20
> i have backups of important data, but i'd rather not have to set the
> damn thing up again; you know how it is :-), should have backed up th=
e
> whole system, whoopsie, next time.
>=20
> the mayhem starts with:
>=20
> "Oct  8 02:38:26 (none) kernel: btrfs bad tree block start 2463035801=
6
> 24630292480"

Ok, so the drive has decided to jumble up our blocks a little bit.  Thi=
s
message means we're finding the wrong data at a given offset.

I can help you copy things off but I don't think this FS is going to be
good any longer.  Are you interested in copying the latest bits off or
do you just want to cut your losses?

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-08 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-08  3:07 Slow link/Capacity changed + Kernel OOPS... possible hardware issues, ideas? C Anthony Risinger
2010-10-08  3:20 ` Chris Ball
2010-10-08  4:34   ` C Anthony Risinger
2010-10-08 14:53 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-10-08 23:28   ` C Anthony Risinger
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTimC140L6Wv23NTNHcffSmeqeHKcM0DH0D-fUMz8@mail.gmail.com>
2010-10-09 10:30       ` C Anthony Risinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101008145319.GK4804@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=anthony@extof.me \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).