From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xavier Nicollet <nicollet@jeru.org>
Subject: Re: Update to Project_ideas wiki page
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:19:39 +0100
Message-ID: <20101117171939.GH22417@jeru.org>
References: <m3hbfg3acu.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org> <20101117143103.GA2401@selene> <AANLkTi=YcVE44g9waRBHQPido4_xf1o5hE4zmTPqVBxN@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicollet@jeru.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Cc: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Bart Noordervliet <bart@noordervliet.net>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=YcVE44g9waRBHQPido4_xf1o5hE4zmTPqVBxN@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Le 17 novembre 2010 =E0 16:12, Bart Noordervliet a =E9crit:
> Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
> modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
> discussed previously in the "Raid1 with 3 drives" thread of March thi=
s
> year? I.e. abandon the burdened raid* terminology in favour of
> something that makes more sense for a filesystem.

I would agree with that.

--=20
Xavier Nicollet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html