linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, security@kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: prevent heap corruption in btrfs_ioctl_space_info()
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:51:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110209155130.GA2564@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297260766.2327.40.camel@dan>

On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> Commit bf5fc093c5b625e4259203f1cee7ca73488a5620 refactored
> btrfs_ioctl_space_info() and introduced several security issues.
> 
> space_args.space_slots is an unsigned 64-bit type controlled by a
> possibly unprivileged caller.  The comparison as a signed int type
> allows providing values that are treated as negative and cause the
> subsequent allocation size calculation to wrap, or be truncated to 0.
> By providing a size that's truncated to 0, kmalloc() will return
> ZERO_SIZE_PTR.  It's also possible to provide a value smaller than the
> slot count.  The subsequent loop ignores the allocation size when
> copying data in, resulting in a heap overflow or write to ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> 
> The fix changes the slot count type and comparison typecast to u64,
> which prevents truncation or signedness errors, and also ensures that we
> don't copy more data than we've allocated in the subsequent loop.  Note
> that zero-size allocations are no longer possible since there is already
> an explicit check for space_args.space_slots being 0 and truncation of
> this value is no longer an issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-09 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-09 14:12 [PATCH] btrfs: prevent heap corruption in btrfs_ioctl_space_info() Dan Rosenberg
2011-02-09 15:51 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2011-02-09 16:16   ` Josef Bacik
2011-02-09 16:45     ` Dan Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110209155130.GA2564@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).