From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
Subject: Re: raid5 - again
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:27:02 +1100
Message-ID: <201102201227.06787.chris@csamuel.org>
References: <10135916.88.1298149890595.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <AANLkTi=zQDZHof18ONjKQQ2y1RAT4CMyRvmJOg5p=dnb@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart14596495.rdIGy8ZHq2";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=zQDZHof18ONjKQQ2y1RAT4CMyRvmJOg5p=dnb@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

--nextPart14596495.rdIGy8ZHq2
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:48:24 AM Marcin Kuk wrote:

> IMO Raid5 in btrfs should be implemented from scratch.

I believe Roy was referring to the development work that
others were doing on raid5 in btrfs and was residing outside
of Chris's trees.

However, as Hugo has pointed out, Chris is busy with getting
a functional btrfsck going.

All the best,
Chris
=2D-=20
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
=46or more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP

--nextPart14596495.rdIGy8ZHq2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUATWBt5o1yjaOTJg85AQIapwf/SjWYQSu2FAOlPGx3hbKb7eedCcwkDFiu
67spzs3ZDH/ATamkN7Mg1Dnrf+N0SMTDVyI+DnsnWFSI1vbiN7BUwtFFfh0Nr4wZ
OxR65+nXXHXilT9C633eTLryEdyuZSy+sYPN7C5fZjmvVUutb8FAP8drtJ8zV/7d
PrRjE4RmB0DrssXCAjaPjS/Bu67wJbdlceBDaLUPeB26LoYuASGd/NaviCUV3j1s
cs3jBjKNmJ5tQIBchwQ5x+6mcgalLFYp0oYVHfMB7su32QxJ4gFUJRZwZrZ8Xu4J
JEh8Cl+o1QiSIGuS398wS1V5E2W70qd/rvooY1VsJqQhNsBHC8IU8Q==
=BEnS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart14596495.rdIGy8ZHq2--