linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr>
To: helmut@hullen.de
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs balancing start - and stop?
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:53:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110403185341.GA11024@yahoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Bj0jd3Ey1uB@helmut.hullen.de>

2011-04-01 21:26:00 +0200, Helmut Hullen:
> Hallo, Stephane,

Hi Helmut,

> Du meintest am 01.04.11:
> 
> >> balancing about 2 TByte needed about 20 hours.
> > [...]
> 
> > I've got a balance running since Monday on a 9TB volume (3.5 of which
> > are used, 3.2 allegedly free), showing no sign of finishing soon.
> > Should I be worried?
> 
> > Using /proc/sys/vm/block_dump, I can see it's seeking all over the
> > place, which is probably why throughput is not high. I can also see
> > it writing several times to the same sectors.
> 
> 
> Hugo has explained the limits of regarding
> 
>         dmesg | grep relocating
> 
> or (more simple) the last lines of "dmesg" and looking for the  
> "relocating" lines. But: what do these lines tell now? What is the  
> (pessimistic) estimation when you extrapolate the data?
> 
> (please excuse my gerlish)
[...]

$ dmesg | grep reloc | sed -e 1b -e '$!d'
[370178.209571] btrfs: relocating block group 5612075220992 flags 20
[546163.062739] btrfs: relocating block group 3923616202752 flags 20

So, if it's to go down to zero:

$ echo $((3923616202752*(546163.062739-370178.209571)/(5612075220992-3923616202752)/86400))
4.7332292856705722

4.7 more days to go. And I reckon it will have written about 9
TB to disk by that time (which is the total size of the volume,
though only 3.8TB are occupied).

-- 
Stephane

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-03 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01 11:14 btrfs balancing start - and stop? Struan Bartlett
2011-04-01 11:59 ` Hugo Mills
2011-04-05 16:06   ` Struan Bartlett
2011-04-01 12:12 ` Helmut Hullen
2011-04-01 13:22   ` Konstantinos Skarlatos
2011-04-01 13:36     ` Helmut Hullen
2011-04-01 13:52       ` Hugo Mills
     [not found]     ` <20110401133736.GB2984@carfax.org.uk>
2011-04-01 14:24       ` Konstantinos Skarlatos
2011-04-01 18:33   ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-04-01 19:26     ` Helmut Hullen
2011-04-03 18:53       ` Stephane Chazelas [this message]
2011-04-03 19:35         ` Helmut Hullen
2011-04-04 19:07           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-04-06 11:43             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-04-11  8:42               ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-04-11  9:14                 ` Helmut Hullen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110403185341.GA11024@yahoo.fr \
    --to=stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=helmut@hullen.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).