linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: don't spin in shrink_delalloc if there is nothing to free
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:27:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110510222732.4fc79ef7@sf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC80F9C.10706@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1828 bytes --]

On Mon, 09 May 2011 12:00:28 -0400
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/07/2011 05:29 PM, slyich@gmail.com wrote:
> > Observed as a large delay when --mixed filesystem is filled up.
> > Test example:
> > 1. create tiny --mixed FS:
> >     $ dd if=/dev/zero of=2G.img seek=$((2048 * 1024 * 1024 - 1)) count=1 bs=1
> >     $ mkfs.btrfs --mixed 2G.img
> >     $ mount -oloop 2G.img /mnt/ut/
> > 2. Try to fill it up:
> >     $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=10M.file bs=10240 count=1024
> >     $ seq 1 256 | while read file_no; do echo $file_no; time cp 10M.file ${file_no}.copy; done
> >
> > Up to '200.copy' it goes fast, but when disk fills-up each -ENOSPC
> > message takes 3 seconds to pop-up _every_ ENOSPC (and in usermode linux
> > it's even more: 30-60 seconds!). (Maybe, time depends on kernel's timer resolution).
> >
> > No IO, no CPU load, just rescheduling. Some debugging revealed busy spinning
> > in shrink_delalloc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich<slyfox@gentoo.org>
> > ---
> >   fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |    4 ++++
> >   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > index 9ee6bd5..9f5fdd3 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > @@ -3425,6 +3425,10 @@ static int shrink_delalloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> >   	if (reserved == 0)
> >   		return 0;
> >
> > +	/* nothing to shrink - nothing to reclaim */
> > +	if (root->fs_info->delalloc_bytes == 0)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >   	max_reclaim = min(reserved, to_reclaim);
> >
> >   	while (loops<  1024) {
> 
> Nice catch, you can add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Will add it (and fix patch enumeration) and resend.

Thanks for the review!

-- 

  Sergei

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-07 21:29 [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: typo: 'btrfS' -> 'btrfs' slyich
2011-05-07 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: don't spin in shrink_delalloc if there is nothing to free slyich
2011-05-09 16:00   ` Josef Bacik
2011-05-10 19:27     ` Sergei Trofimovich [this message]
2011-05-07 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: fix typo 'testeing' -> 'testing' slyich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110510222732.4fc79ef7@sf \
    --to=slyfox@gentoo.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).