From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Fasheh Subject: Re: very poor read / write performance compared to other FS's? Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:34:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110512233422.GI17822@wotan.suse.de> References: Reply-To: Mark Fasheh Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Fstump Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33:35PM +0100, Marek Fstump wrote: > I am very interested in using BTRFS for my solution but in basic tests > it seems to be very poor on read and write performance. I am > surprised by this so suspect that maybe I am doing something > incorrectly or that there are updates I should be using, but I am not > sure how I update BTRFS on SLES11 Hey Marek, just fyi that the btrfs version in sles11 sp1 is old (by btrfs standards :). That's not surprising of course as btrfs isn't supported yet in any enterprise distributions. My guess is that you should see better results with a more recent kernel. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh