From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Trofimovich Subject: Re: Integration branch pushed out to btrfs-unstable Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:44:18 +0300 Message-ID: <20110525214418.225ec273@sf> References: <1306179381-sup-443@shiny> <4DDCF79F.80405@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Ua7w2zO+RAP+9Y2vZS5dkAR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Chris Mason , linux-btrfs , Li Zefan , Miao Xie To: Arne Jansen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DDCF79F.80405@gmx.net> List-ID: --Sig_/Ua7w2zO+RAP+9Y2vZS5dkAR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The commit >=20 > commit c4f675cd40d955d539180506c09515c90169b15b > Author: Sergei Trofimovich > Date: Fri May 20 20:20:30 2011 +0000 >=20 > btrfs: don't spin in shrink_delalloc if there is nothing to free >=20 > gives me very early ENOSPC in my tests on a small volume (7GB). What king of test is that? I'd like to reproduce it. Does it do a lot of parallel I/O? May I ask you to try to reproduce the problem with this sole patch on top of linus master? --=20 Sergei --Sig_/Ua7w2zO+RAP+9Y2vZS5dkAR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3dTgcACgkQcaHudmEf86qAUQCfbywDa0ayGwmueAkNbDylD2tL 6+UAnR02tYsOaVshbxnE0vSwLMjYuvqD =ML5O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ua7w2zO+RAP+9Y2vZS5dkAR--