linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Memory leak?
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:09:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110703190913.GA4474@yahoo.fr> (raw)

Hiya,

I've got a server using brtfs to implement a backup system.
Basically, every night, for a few machines, I rsync (and other
methods) their file systems into one btrfs subvolume each and
then snapshot it.

On that server, the btrfs fs is on 3 3TB drives, mounted with
compress-force. Every week, I rsync the most recent snapshot of
a selection of subvolumes onto an encrypted (LUKS) external hard
drive (3TB as well).

Now, on a few occasions (actually, most of the time), when I
rsynced the data (about 2.5TB) onto the external drive, the
system would crash after some time with "Out of memory and no
killable process". Basically, something in kernel was allocating
the whole memory, then oom mass killed everybody and crash.

That was with ubuntu 2.6.38. I had then moved to debian and
2.6.39 and thought the problem was fixed, but it just happened
again with 3.0.0rc5 while rsyncing onto an initially empty btrfs
fs.

I'm going to resume the rsync again, and it's likely to happen
again. Is there anything simple (as I've got very little time to
look into that) I could do to help debug the issue (I'm not 100%
sure it's btrfs fault but that's the most likely culprit).

For a start, I'll switch the console to serial, and watch
/proc/vmstat. Anything else I could do?

Note that that server has never crashed when doing a lot of IO
at the same time in a lot of subvolumes with remote hosts. It's
only when copying data to that external drive on LUKS that it
seems to crash.

Cheers,
Stephane

             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-03 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-03 19:09 Stephane Chazelas [this message]
2011-07-03 19:38 ` Memory leak? cwillu
2011-07-06  8:11   ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07  8:09     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07  8:20       ` Li Zefan
2011-07-07  8:37         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 12:44     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 15:06       ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 15:41         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:11           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:17             ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 16:57               ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:11               ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:15           ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 17:06             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:04             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:12               ` Chris Mason
2011-07-09  7:09                 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09  7:42                   ` A lot of writing to FS only read (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10  5:58                   ` Memory leak? Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:09         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 19:25           ` cwillu
2011-07-09 20:36             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10 12:44               ` Chris Mason
2011-07-10 18:37                 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11  9:01                   ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 15:00                     ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 15:35                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 16:25                         ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 16:34                           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-12 11:40                     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 12:12                     ` write(2) taking 4s. (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 16:22                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-17  9:17                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 10:39                         ` write(2) taking 4s Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 19:37                           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-19  9:32                             ` Stephane Chazelas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110703190913.GA4474@yahoo.fr \
    --to=stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).