From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
To: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:37:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725213751.GF6911@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E28CAA0.2070801@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:56:00AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > index aa91773..ff339b2 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> > @@ -3277,6 +3277,9 @@ again:
> > }
> >
> > ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, extent_root, flags);
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> You need mutex_unlock() before return.
Of course... Here's an updated patch (git tree has also been updated).
Thanks,
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
[PATCH] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk
I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in
init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of
init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior
change has occurred here.
do_chunk_alloc() also needed an update since it calls btrfs_alloc_chunk()
which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info->full on any
error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_
-ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 ++++
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index aa91773..f6af423 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3277,6 +3277,9 @@ again:
}
ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, extent_root, flags);
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC)
+ goto out;
+
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
if (ret)
space_info->full = 1;
@@ -3286,6 +3289,7 @@ again:
space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
space_info->chunk_alloc = 0;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
+out:
mutex_unlock(&extent_root->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 530a2fc..90d956c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,8 @@ static noinline int find_next_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_key found_key;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
- BUG_ON(!path);
+ if (!path)
+ return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = objectid;
key.offset = (u64)-1;
@@ -2663,7 +2664,8 @@ static noinline int init_first_rw_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = find_next_chunk(fs_info->chunk_root,
BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, &chunk_offset);
- BUG_ON(ret);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
alloc_profile = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
(fs_info->metadata_alloc_profile &
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 19:48 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors v2 Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_balance() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot Mark Fasheh
2011-07-22 0:45 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-25 21:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2011-07-26 13:14 ` Justin Ossevoort
2011-07-22 0:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-25 21:37 ` Mark Fasheh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-14 22:14 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_balance() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Mark Fasheh
2011-07-15 2:43 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-18 21:36 ` Mark Fasheh
2011-07-18 23:12 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725213751.GF6911@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).