linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 7/9] btrfs: Make pin_down_extent return void
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:20:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110810232123.300532775@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110810232027.129702612@suse.com

 pin_down_extent performs some operations which can't fail and then calls
 set_extent_dirty, which has two failure cases via set_extent_bit:
 1) Return -EEXIST if exclusive bits are set
    - Since it doesn't use any exclusive bits, this failure case can't
       occur.
 2) Return -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated
    - Since it's called with gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL, this failure case
      can't occur.

 With no failure cases, it can return void.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4175,9 +4175,9 @@ static u64 first_logical_byte(struct btr
 	return bytenr;
 }
 
-static int pin_down_extent(struct btrfs_root *root,
-			   struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
-			   u64 bytenr, u64 num_bytes, int reserved)
+static void pin_down_extent(struct btrfs_root *root,
+			    struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
+			    u64 bytenr, u64 num_bytes, int reserved)
 {
 	spin_lock(&cache->space_info->lock);
 	spin_lock(&cache->lock);
@@ -4194,7 +4194,6 @@ static int pin_down_extent(struct btrfs_
 	/* __GFP_NOFAIL means it can't return -ENOMEM */
 	set_extent_dirty(root->fs_info->pinned_extents, bytenr,
 			 bytenr + num_bytes - 1, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /*



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-10 23:20 [patch 0/9] btrfs: More error handling patches Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 1/9] btrfs: Add btrfs_panic() Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 2/9] btrfs: Catch locking failures in {set,clear}_extent_bit Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 3/9] btrfs: Push up set_extent_bit errors to callers Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-11  0:08   ` Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 4/9] btrfs: Push up lock_extent " Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 5/9] btrfs: Push up clear_extent_bit " Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 6/9] btrfs: Push up unlock_extent " Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 8/9] btrfs: Push up btrfs_pin_extent failures Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-10 23:20 ` [patch 9/9] btrfs: Push up non-looped btrfs_start_transaction failures Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-11  1:27   ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-08-11  1:58     ` Jeff Mahoney
2011-08-11  2:18       ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-08-11  2:32         ` Jeff Mahoney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110810232123.300532775@suse.com \
    --to=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).