From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Elric Milon Subject: Re: Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ? Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:10:21 +0200 Message-ID: <201109051910.21912.whirm@gmx.com> References: <4E64D3D5.7020407@petaramesh.org> <20110905140023.GP9907@carfax.org.uk> <20110905202000.4c539297@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" To: "linux-btrfs" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110905202000.4c539297@natsu> List-ID: On Monday 05 September 2011 16:20:00 Roman Mamedov wrote: [...] > real 0m6.924s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.464s > > To be fair, this was on the 2.6.39.2 kernel, and the performance seems to > be somewhat better on 3.0 (though I didn't do tests like this one or any > significant dpkg operations on it yet). Same here with 3.1-rc4 in my Debian SID amd64 laptop with Vertex II SSD disk. `--> time sync ; time sync; time sync; time sync;time sync ; time sync; time sync; time sync;time sync ; time sync; time sync; time sync sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 3% cpu 2.509 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 3% cpu 2.690 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 4% cpu 2.219 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 3% cpu 2.270 total sync 0.00s user 0.08s system 3% cpu 2.120 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 4% cpu 2.170 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 4% cpu 2.120 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 3% cpu 2.189 total sync 0.00s user 0.08s system 3% cpu 2.341 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 3% cpu 2.262 total sync 0.00s user 0.10s system 2% cpu 3.967 total sync 0.00s user 0.09s system 4% cpu 2.271 total -- Elric Milon