From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Brunner <chb@muc.de>, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ceph on btrfs [was Re: ceph on non-btrfs file systems]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:23:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111026132354.GC4588@shiny.Mikenopa.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111025202248.GE3703@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:22:48PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Attached is a perf-report. I have included the whole report, so that
> > > > you can see the difference between the good and the bad
> > > > btrfs-endio-wri.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We also shouldn't be running run_ordered_operations, man this is screwed up,
> > > thanks so much for this, I should be able to nail this down pretty easily.
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Looks like we're getting there from reserve_metadata_bytes when we join
> > the transaction?
> >
>
> We don't do reservations in the endio stuff, we assume you've reserved all the
> space you need in delalloc, plus we would have seen reserve_metadata_bytes in
> the trace. Though it does look like perf is lying to us in at least one case
> sicne btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent is only called from log replay and not
> during normal runtime, so it definitely shouldn't be showing up. Thanks,
Whoops, I should have read that num_items > 0 check harder.
btrfs_end_transaction is doing it by setting ->blocked = 1
if (lock && !atomic_read(&root->fs_info->open_ioctl_trans) &&
should_end_transaction(trans, root)) {
trans->transaction->blocked = 1;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
smp_wmb();
}
if (lock && cur_trans->blocked && !cur_trans->in_commit) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
if (throttle) {
/*
* We may race with somebody else here so end up having
* to call end_transaction on ourselves again, so inc
* our use_count.
*/
trans->use_count++;
return btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
} else {
wake_up_process(info->transaction_kthread);
}
}
perf is definitely lying a little bit about the trace ;)
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-26 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110231739380.25255@cobra.newdream.net>
[not found] ` <CAO47_-9jp===DT=scpe=U8BnPnUCAVz7xUWVCC9AMVmx67CdaA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-24 17:06 ` ceph on btrfs [was Re: ceph on non-btrfs file systems] Sage Weil
2011-10-24 19:51 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-24 20:35 ` Chris Mason
2011-10-24 21:34 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-24 21:37 ` Arne Jansen
2011-10-25 11:56 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-25 12:23 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-25 14:25 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-25 15:00 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-25 15:05 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-25 15:13 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-25 20:15 ` Chris Mason
2011-10-25 20:22 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-26 0:16 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-26 8:21 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-26 13:23 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-10-27 15:07 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-27 18:14 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-25 16:36 ` Sage Weil
2011-10-25 19:09 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-25 22:27 ` Sage Weil
2011-10-27 19:52 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-27 20:39 ` Christian Brunner
[not found] ` <CAO47_-_+Oqs1sHeYEBfxgwugSUYKftQLQ9jEyDgFPFu8fXe34w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO47_-8YGAxoYOBRKxLP2HULqEtV5bMugzzybq3srCVFZczgGA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-31 10:25 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-31 13:29 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-31 14:04 ` Josef Bacik
2011-10-25 10:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-25 16:23 ` Sage Weil
[not found] <CAO47_-9L7SdQwhJ27B6yzrqG8xvj+CeZHeSutgeCixcv7kUidg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110252221510.6574@cobra.newdream.net>
2011-10-26 8:12 ` Christian Brunner
2011-10-26 16:32 ` Sage Weil
[not found] <4EA86FD7.4030407@tuxadero.com>
2011-10-27 10:53 ` Martin Mailand
2011-10-27 10:59 ` Stefan Majer
2011-10-27 11:17 ` Martin Mailand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111026132354.GC4588@shiny.Mikenopa.local \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chb@muc.de \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox