From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20111108182728.GR4954@shiny> References: <20111106183851.GA4339@shiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-btrfs , LKML To: Dan Merillat Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason = wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of = long > > running projects and cleanup queues. =A0I've got btrfs patches in t= he new > > kernel.org btrfs repo. =A0There are two different branches with the= same > > changes. =A0for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested again= st > > Linus' tree as of yesterday. >=20 > [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2 > [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed >=20 > FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that > whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again. Format change in 3.2 or > 32/64 bit compatibility issues? I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 an= d 3.1 code before releasing. I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit. Are there any other messages in dmesg? Could you please see what btrfs-debug-tree says? -chris