From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Subject: Re: BTRFS fsck ?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:45:30 +0600
Message-ID: <20111122174530.7994058d@natsu>
References: <4ECB8A60.2020402@chibois.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/9G/fI=Yjuj5bay/Igf7uzPH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOp?= CHIBOIS <herve@chibois.net>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4ECB8A60.2020402@chibois.net>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

--Sig_/9G/fI=Yjuj5bay/Igf7uzPH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:41:20 +0100
Herv=C3=A9 CHIBOIS <herve@chibois.net> wrote:

> Hello Team
>=20
> for personnal use, I'm interested in cosolidating all my ext4=20
> sub-filesystems into a single one using BTRFS.
>=20
> I can"t afford loosing my data... and my question is : is there a=20
> release date for the fsck tool for btrfs ?

The ONLY guard against losing data is having an up-to-date backup, not fsck.

You are absolutely crazy if you store the data you can't afford to lose, wi=
thout backups, just relying on what currently, ext4 fsck?

--=20
With respect,
Roman

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."

--Sig_/9G/fI=Yjuj5bay/Igf7uzPH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk7Li1oACgkQTLKSvz+PZwgSGgCfSiz5F4GrDllbpoFV5ysz/WNZ
Q7kAnicIi2z4ZcQS1m+nKx+rAuqU2NYo
=Kyab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/9G/fI=Yjuj5bay/Igf7uzPH--