From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
To: "krzf83@gmail.com " <krzf83@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs and load (sys)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:56:16 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111123205616.73b4d0a7@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1PRSnhqo3yU4b0sbcYLfByb_pTDuAOL2xo4fryiEoacr8iYg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1394 bytes --]
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:43:14 +0100
"krzf83@gmail.com " <krzf83@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been using btrfs for two months now. Every day between 02:00 and
> 08:00 I rsync some 300GB data (milions of files) to btrfs device and
> then make snapshot. Next day i rsync again 300GG little changed (rsync
> "in place"). First days it worked perfectly. Then loadavg (sys load)
> started to rise. Now, after 60 days of rsync+shapshots sys load is so
> high that whole server becames quite unresponsive betweend 02:00 and
> 08:00. I never deleted any shapshot (yet) to its not rebalancing
> thing.
Hello,
I employ the same scenario, except that my rsync-(actually mirrordir-) destination btrfs device is only mounted briefly for the copy-then-snapshot operation, and unmounted during the rest of the time. Haven't noticed any performance problems yet, but even though I have about 2 TB of data there, it's probably not millions of files.
Have you tried unmounting the FS and then mounting it again, to see if it solves the performance problem (at least for a while)? Or just keeping it mostly unmounted, I suppose what you have is a partition with backups, so keeping it mostly offline is better reliability-wise.
--
With respect,
Roman
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 14:43 btrfs and load (sys) krzf83@gmail.com
2011-11-23 14:56 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2011-11-23 15:08 ` krzf83@gmail.com
2011-11-23 15:17 ` krzf83@gmail.com
2011-11-24 1:00 ` Chris Samuel
2011-11-24 1:11 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-11-25 4:40 ` Chris Samuel
2011-11-23 17:01 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-24 0:42 ` krzf83@gmail.com
2011-12-02 4:14 ` krzf83@gmail.com
2011-12-02 4:27 ` Chris Samuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111123205616.73b4d0a7@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.ru \
--cc=krzf83@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).