From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:39:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20120104163946.GA8153@infradead.org> References: <1324552138-30584-1-git-send-email-list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Schmidt Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1324552138-30584-1-git-send-email-list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> List-ID: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:08:58PM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote: > This is a btrfs specific scratch test checking the backref walker. It > creates a file system with compressed and uncompressed data extents, picks > files randomly and uses filefrag to get their extents. It then asks the > btrfs utility (inspect-internal) to do the backref resolving from fs-logical > address (the one filefrag calls "physical") back to the inode number and > file-logical offset, verifying the result. I was about to apply this, but for some reason it fails for me when running xfstest on xfs: 276 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 276.out.bad) --- 276.out 2012-01-04 16:14:36.000000000 +0000 +++ 276.out.bad 2012-01-04 16:32:26.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 276 -*** test backref walking -*** done +common.rc: Error: $TEST_DEV (/dev/vdb1) is not a MOUNTED btrfs filesystem +Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on +/dev/vdb1 xfs 39042944 32928 39010016 1% /mnt/test *** unmount which is a bit confusing