From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: restriper interface
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:32:51 +0600
Message-ID: <20120107203251.24533460@natsu>
References: <1325860680-19403-1-git-send-email-idryomov@gmail.com>
	<201201071348.45052.kreijack@inwind.it>
	<20120107142529.GA8404@zambezi.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/Zi7ZFVyV6/UJvT1fWs4Ks2a"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120107142529.GA8404@zambezi.lan>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

--Sig_/Zi7ZFVyV6/UJvT1fWs4Ks2a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 16:25:29 +0200
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

> IMHO it would be much better if we had our long names and a handful of
> predefined abbreviations (like ip command for example).

Does the ip command use just a handful of predefined abbrebiations?

ip addr show
ip add sho
ip ad sh
ip a s

all work.=20
which suggests to me they use exactly the same scheme as btrfs currently.

--=20
With respect,
Roman

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."

--Sig_/Zi7ZFVyV6/UJvT1fWs4Ks2a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8IV5MACgkQTLKSvz+PZwgUkQCeLinu8RUEQ2oygugZCM9EEtha
48gAoICnczDIG+mHj6X1c7oEjjAsy/+L
=n3md
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Zi7ZFVyV6/UJvT1fWs4Ks2a--