From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Setting options permanently? Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:23:44 +0600 Message-ID: <20120128142344.6f18c989@natsu> References: <4F22BCCC.5090800@danisch.de> <4F234616.6020407@danisch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/LmWNF3W+U9D+rElP+1qP.q4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Klein Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: --Sig_/LmWNF3W+U9D+rElP+1qP.q4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:05:41 +1100 Ben Klein wrote: > If the compression routine changes in a later kernel/filesystem revision, There are already two different algorithms, zlib and lzo, and a third one - snappy - planned for inclusion. > then you could end up with some files using one routine and others using = another. Which is absolutely not a problem even right now. --=20 With respect, Roman ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Stallman had a printer, with code he could not see. So he began to tinker, and set the software free." --Sig_/LmWNF3W+U9D+rElP+1qP.q4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8jsJAACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiocwCeN0sJxu7+Fx4S/TNDq69mEnWk c1cAoIl1Z1B9GBVd/woqPKQ2VKjy4LeP =ZSTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/LmWNF3W+U9D+rElP+1qP.q4--