From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: subvolume info in /proc/mounts
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 07:18:24 -0500
Message-ID: <20120206121823.GA24922@infradead.org>
References: <13975aa6fbfab9c845a2582c043aa938.squirrel@webmail01.edunet.gr>
 <20120204214430.GA15350@twin.jikos.cz>
 <2ed5fe028fdcfd3d53cf217e13b827d9.squirrel@webmail01.edunet.gr>
 <20120206115321.GB15350@twin.jikos.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: Nikos Voutsinas <nvoutsin@noc.edunet.gr>, dave@jikos.cz,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kreijack@gmail.com,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120206115321.GB15350@twin.jikos.cz>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> > It's quite old, but what was this about;
> > 
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487
> 
> Thanks, the patch looks ok and works as expected.
> 
> Goffredo, do you want to resend it? (The lock around the mnt_root is not
> necessary.) I think it's a -rc material, more people came to ask about
> this on irc channel lately, we don't need to wait a full release cycle
> to merge this fix.

No, it doesn't look good.  Please do not introduce anything touching
non-superblock fields in ->show_options, thanks.