From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: can't read superblock (but could mount) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:23:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20120215132322.GR1573@shiny> References: <20120210203051.Horde.q5KnHsL8999PNXBrH5AlxdA@webmail.df.eu> <20120210221842.GU8384@shiny> <20120210233959.GV8384@shiny> <20120211072725.Horde.8iYhMlNNcXdPNgpNS2yG-PA@webmail.df.eu> <20120213130943.GA1573@shiny> <20120214184131.GZ1573@shiny> <20120214211422.GE1573@shiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Nentwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:03:49AM +0100, Timo Nentwig wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Chris Mason wrote: > > >Ok, 3.2 shouldn't have done this. Was this an external drive? What > >else do you have on the system? > > Nothing special actually. Standard arch linux with virtualbox kernel modules. > It's a SSD if this should matter. Mounted with ssd,compress=lzo,noatime. Ok, it sounds like we've got some memory corruption problems in here. Hopefully not from virtualbox, but I'd start with an memtest. > > >Is this the same FS that was corrupted or a different one? > > Different one. Created from an old 3.2.1 gentoo install (btrfs 0.19-dirty). Different FS, same machine? Please include all the kernel messages. -chris