From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: mkfs.btrfs fails on ARM Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:51:26 +0600 Message-ID: <20120217005126.7beebd82@natsu> References: <20120216220811.534cbf02@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/fFu0OSkpKNojsQfEvKCNHHv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Roman Mamedov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120216220811.534cbf02@natsu> List-ID: --Sig_/fFu0OSkpKNojsQfEvKCNHHv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:08:11 +0600 Roman Mamedov wrote: > # mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop7=20 >=20 > WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL > WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using >=20 > mkfs.btrfs: volumes.c:1575: btrfs_read_chunk_tree: Assertion `!(ret)' fai= led. > Aborted I reran the command on a 1GB loop device (with the same result), and here is its gzipped image: http://media.romanrm.ru/tmp/btrfs-made-on-arm.img.gz (1M= B) This can't be opened by btrfsck with the same error message, and on amd64 t= oo. btrfsck: volumes.c:1575: btrfs_read_chunk_tree: Assertion `!(ret)' failed. So the problem is clearly with mkfs on ARM, creating an invalid FS. --=20 With respect, Roman ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Stallman had a printer, with code he could not see. So he began to tinker, and set the software free." --Sig_/fFu0OSkpKNojsQfEvKCNHHv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk89UC4ACgkQTLKSvz+PZwggSwCbBH3rqh4FD8HSW2/nhYkGUfUR 6TUAmwUVI6QNMM/TgwPftgU3ysYgrNpf =fHrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fFu0OSkpKNojsQfEvKCNHHv--