From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hugo Mills Subject: Re: Can't mount, power failure - recoverable? Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20120326084336.GD14080@carfax.org.uk> References: <20120318151615.GE3976@shiny> <20120319180235.GH3976@shiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V" Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Skylar Burtenshaw Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:34:46AM +0000, Skylar Burtenshaw wrote: > Hey - been a few days, not meaning to pester but I wanted to make sure my > previous message didn't slip through the cracks. If I offended, I apologize - I > certainly didn't mean to, and my attempts at joviality can come across as > abrasive. If you simply haven't had time to look into this yet, or it's bizarre > enough that it's taking time to isolate, take all the time you need. Thank you. I suspect that Chris is working hard on getting queued-up patches ready to go into the 3.4 kernel. He's usually quite quiet while he's doing that. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Anyone who claims their cryptographic protocol is secure is --- either a genius or a fool. Given the genius/fool ratio for our species, the odds aren't good. --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPcCw4IKyzvlFcI40RAqTuAJ0YRt0tgCzN3SpwbzzxJw90q0ZR7wCcCpIV mNF2OEkqabl51N/QAbTEFnc= =MDim -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TybLhxa8M7aNoW+V--