From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Samuel Subject: Re: btr fs unmountable after disk failure Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:00:14 +1000 Message-ID: <201204132200.20511.chris@csamuel.org> References: <20120413105822.GF4856@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1677505.9rCFrmIuQd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120413105822.GF4856@carfax.org.uk> List-ID: --nextPart1677505.9rCFrmIuQd Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 13 April 2012 20:58:22 Hugo Mills wrote: > I think you need "-o degraded" in this case. I've always wondered why btrfs doesn't fall back to this by default if=20 it fails to find a device, would seem the obvious thing to do (we=20 don't have to tell mdadm if a disk has gone away for instance). cheers, Chris =2D-=20 Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. =46or more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --nextPart1677505.9rCFrmIuQd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAT4gVT41yjaOTJg85AQKacgf+LCcXUF9Ps+vVkJeGDdrBZUrUiCZXmkWZ SP1KLhhV8QeHZbcoKvX6x3NhHV11+VL9NVXJmP6KCzCtbAkwyGyTC/Uo1ORd/sss CdIdd/XLFcqPjQuRYX6AyVg+Hgv4LJB/1BHG+Y+HFVaXMG532BlkJRC4OtRvdKxv qCkqbMHgKdATHQ4OYDm+Nxr0BwAN9TbxVgEt5EzWRxmxeiMrRLj4Gm8OKiKbBvAd Pqz41z5+FNxkXrTy/GprLONcxFqdr4vbplvnOUOocwwzVBhLsOEQhJ2yGbGa5ZcB jyT7En1NWfln9WVBDBPNvKzhIvCFrMEniXsZBo/dYhwGv8tKV2r1sA== =REY8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1677505.9rCFrmIuQd--