From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Optionally enforced time-based ACLs for BTRFS
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:57:08 -0400
Message-ID: <20120427145708.GG7340@shiny>
References: <DE6EA944EF16AF4CA4C0D1856C83808006C7F05E96@ex7>
 <20120426200423.GR22794@shiny>
 <DE6EA944EF16AF4CA4C0D1856C83808006C7F05ECB@ex7>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Bruzos <David.Bruzos@jaxport.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE6EA944EF16AF4CA4C0D1856C83808006C7F05ECB@ex7>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:27:12PM -0400, David Bruzos wrote:
> Hi Chris:
> 	Thank you for your very informative response.  I will post the message to linux-fsdevel and see what they have to say about it.
> 
> 	Any comments you would like to share regarding why something like what I suggested has apparently never been implemented?

Most features in the kernel are based on customer demand.  I think we
just haven't had enough people asking for it ;)

-chris