Re: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?)

[Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1137 bytes --]

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Felix Blanke wrote:
> On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> >Hallo, Clemens,
> >
> >Du meintest am 08.05.12:
> >
> >>>>But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for
> >>>>repairing an ext2/3/4 system.
> >
> >>Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as
> >>doomed.
> >
> >Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the
> >directory tree does the job.
> 
> Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is
> telling you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn
> problem, no matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable
> if you lose one disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying
> to tell you for the last 15 mails :)

   I think he's got the point by now. Can we stop this thread now,
please? It doesn't seem to be serving any further purpose.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
             --- No names... I want to remain anomalous. ---             

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]