From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hugo Mills Subject: Re: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 14:52:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20120508135256.GL8938@carfax.org.uk> References: <4FA9232C.4020308@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A" Cc: helmut@hullen.de, Helmut Hullen , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Felix Blanke Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FA9232C.4020308@gmail.com> List-ID: --bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Felix Blanke wrote: > On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > >Hallo, Clemens, > > > >Du meintest am 08.05.12: > > > >>>>But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for > >>>>repairing an ext2/3/4 system. > > > >>Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as > >>doomed. > > > >Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the > >directory tree does the job. > > Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is > telling you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn > problem, no matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable > if you lose one disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying > to tell you for the last 15 mails :) I think he's got the point by now. Can we stop this thread now, please? It doesn't seem to be serving any further purpose. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- No names... I want to remain anomalous. --- --bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPqSU4IKyzvlFcI40RAlGrAJ4u3O1892Zir49w1A+gnV+FIGtGsQCePe5N PmQLSxztQ52T27FeqlmJZMY= =yAPc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A--