linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	helmut@hullen.de, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: failed disk (was: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?))
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 19:13:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509161312.GA2536@zambezi.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509143735.GQ8938@carfax.org.uk>

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:25:00PM +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> > Du meintest am 07.05.12:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > >> With a file system like ext2/3/4 I can work with several directories
> > >> which are mounted together, but (as said before) one broken disk
> > >> doesn't disturb the others.
> > 
> > >    mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d single should give you that.
> > 
> > Just a small bug, perhaps:
> > 
> > created a system with
> > 
> >         mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d single /dev/sdl1
> >         mount /dev/sdl1 /mnt/Scsi
> >         btrfs device add /dev/sdk1 /mnt/Scsi
> >         btrfs device add /dev/sdm1 /mnt/Scsi
> >         (filling with data)
> > 
> > and
> > 
> >         btrfs fi df /mnt/Scsi
> > 
> > now tells
> > 
> > Data, RAID0: total=183.18GB, used=76.60GB
> > Data: total=80.01GB, used=79.83GB
> > System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=32.00KB
> > System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
> > Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GB, used=192.74MB
> > Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > 
> > "Data, RAID0" confuses me (not very much ...), and the system for  
> > metadata (RAID1) is not told.
> 
>    DUP is two copies of each block, but it allows the two copies to
> live on the same device. It's done this because you started with a
> single device, and you can't do RAID-1 on one device. The first bit of

What Hugo said.  Newer mkfs.btrfs will error out if you try to do this.

> metadata you write to it should automatically upgrade the DUP chunk to
> RAID-1.

We don't "upgrade" chunks in place, only during balance.

> 
>    As to the spurious "upgrade" of single to RAID-0, I thought Ilya
> had stopped it doing that. What kernel version are you running?

I did, but again, we were doing it only as part of balance, not as part
of normal operation.

Helmut, do you have any additional data points - the output of btrfs fi
df right after you created FS or somewhere in the middle of filling it ?

Also could you please paste the output of btrfs fi show and tell us what
kernel version you are running ?

Thanks,

		Ilya

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 10:46 kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?) Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 10:58 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2012-05-07 12:06   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 10:59 ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-07 12:15   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 13:34   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 14:05     ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-07 16:36       ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 17:13         ` Felix Blanke
2012-05-07 17:52           ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 18:00             ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-07 18:25               ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 18:44                 ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-09 13:04                   ` failed disk (was: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?)) Helmut Hullen
2012-05-09 13:19                     ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-09 14:25               ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-09 14:37                 ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-09 15:14                   ` failed disk Helmut Hullen
2012-05-09 15:33                     ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-09 18:49                       ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-09 16:13                   ` Ilya Dryomov [this message]
2012-05-10  2:49                   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 19:30             ` kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?) Daniel Lee
2012-05-07 20:21               ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 20:51                 ` Daniel Lee
2012-05-07 21:17                   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-07 21:27                     ` cwillu
2012-05-07 22:07                 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-05-08  7:39                   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08  7:44                     ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2012-05-08 10:00                       ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 10:41                         ` Clemens Eisserer
2012-05-08 13:13                           ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 13:44                             ` Felix Blanke
2012-05-08 13:52                               ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-08 16:53                               ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 17:24                                 ` Felix Blanke
2012-05-08 18:29                                   ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 18:41                                     ` Felix Blanke
2012-05-08 19:12                                       ` David Sterba
2012-05-08 19:34                                       ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 20:02                                         ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-08 20:19                                           ` Helmut Hullen
2012-05-08 20:56                                             ` Roman Mamedov
2012-05-09 14:46                                               ` Kaspar Schleiser
2012-05-10 10:40                                                 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-05-10 11:55                                                   ` feature request (was: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?)) Helmut Hullen
2012-05-10 19:43                                                   ` kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?) Hubert Kario
2012-05-10 20:15                                                     ` Hugo Mills
2012-05-10 20:23                                                       ` Hubert Kario
2012-05-08 21:42                         ` Hubert Kario
2012-05-07 12:53 ` Liu Bo
2012-05-09 17:32 ` Duncan
2012-05-09 18:06   ` Atila

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120509161312.GA2536@zambezi.lan \
    --to=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=helmut@hullen.de \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).