From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Martin Mailand <martin@tuxadero.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
Christian Brunner <christian@brunner-muc.de>,
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ceph on btrfs 3.4rc
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:48:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120518144759.GA1892@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB56B21.7070800@tuxadero.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> I hit exact the same bug as Christian with your last patch.
>
Ok hopefully this will print something out that makes sense. Thanks,
Josef
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..492c74f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
/* used to order data wrt metadata */
struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree ordered_tree;
- /* for keeping track of orphaned inodes */
- struct list_head i_orphan;
-
/* list of all the delalloc inodes in the FS. There are times we need
* to write all the delalloc pages to disk, and this list is used
* to walk them all.
@@ -156,6 +153,8 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
unsigned dummy_inode:1;
unsigned in_defrag:1;
unsigned delalloc_meta_reserved:1;
+ unsigned has_orphan_item:1;
+ unsigned doing_truncate:1;
/*
* always compress this one file
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 8fd7233..aad2600 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ struct btrfs_root {
struct list_head root_list;
spinlock_t orphan_lock;
- struct list_head orphan_list;
+ atomic_t orphan_inodes;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *orphan_block_rsv;
int orphan_item_inserted;
int orphan_cleanup_state;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index a7ffc88..ff3bf4b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1153,7 +1153,6 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 sectorsize,
root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->dirty_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->orphan_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->root_list);
spin_lock_init(&root->orphan_lock);
spin_lock_init(&root->inode_lock);
@@ -1166,6 +1165,7 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 sectorsize,
atomic_set(&root->log_commit[0], 0);
atomic_set(&root->log_commit[1], 0);
atomic_set(&root->log_writers, 0);
+ atomic_set(&root->orphan_inodes, 0);
root->log_batch = 0;
root->log_transid = 0;
root->last_log_commit = 0;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 61b16c6..7de7f6f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2072,12 +2072,12 @@ void btrfs_orphan_commit_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
int ret;
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes) ||
root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE)
return;
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list)) {
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes)) {
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
return;
}
@@ -2134,8 +2134,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
block_rsv = NULL;
}
- if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
+ if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
#if 0
/*
* For proper ENOSPC handling, we should do orphan
@@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
insert = 1;
#endif
insert = 1;
+ atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved) {
@@ -2166,6 +2167,9 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret && ret != -EEXIST) {
+ spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2195,13 +2199,21 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
int release_rsv = 0;
int ret = 0;
+ /*
+ * evict_inode gets called without holding the i_mutex so we need to
+ * take the orphan lock to make sure we are safe in messing with these.
+ */
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
- delete_item = 1;
+ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+ if (trans) {
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 0;
+ delete_item = 1;
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ }
}
- if (BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved) {
+ if (trans && BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved) {
BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved = 0;
release_rsv = 1;
}
@@ -2209,12 +2221,18 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
if (trans && delete_item) {
ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
+ if (ret)
+ printk(KERN_ERR "couldn't find orphan item for %Lu\n",
+ btrfs_ino(inode));
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or corruption (JDM: Recheck) */
}
if (release_rsv)
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+ if (trans && delete_item)
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2341,6 +2359,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root)
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto out;
}
+ printk(KERN_ERR "auto deleting %Lu\n",
+ found_key.objectid);
ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
found_key.objectid);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or corruption (JDM: Recheck) */
@@ -2353,7 +2373,9 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root)
* the proper thing when we hit it
*/
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
+ atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
+ WARN_ON(BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
/* if we have links, this was a truncate, lets do that */
@@ -3671,7 +3693,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan));
+ BUG_ON(!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item);
goto no_delete;
}
@@ -6683,9 +6705,13 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode)
u64 mask = root->sectorsize - 1;
u64 min_size = btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(root, 1);
+ spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
+ BUG_ON(BTRFS_I(inode)->doing_truncate);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->doing_truncate = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode->i_mapping, inode->i_size);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto real_out;
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, inode->i_size & (~mask), (u64)-1);
btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, inode->i_size, NULL);
@@ -6727,8 +6753,10 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode)
* updating the inode.
*/
rsv = btrfs_alloc_block_rsv(root);
- if (!rsv)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!rsv) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto real_out;
+ }
rsv->size = min_size;
/*
@@ -6847,7 +6875,10 @@ end_trans:
out:
btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, rsv);
-
+real_out:
+ spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->doing_truncate = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
if (ret && !err)
err = ret;
@@ -6914,6 +6945,8 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
ei->dummy_inode = 0;
ei->in_defrag = 0;
ei->delalloc_meta_reserved = 0;
+ ei->has_orphan_item = 0;
+ ei->doing_truncate = 0;
ei->force_compress = BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE;
ei->delayed_node = NULL;
@@ -6927,7 +6960,6 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
mutex_init(&ei->log_mutex);
mutex_init(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(&ei->ordered_tree);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_orphan);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->delalloc_inodes);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->ordered_operations);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&ei->rb_node);
@@ -6972,13 +7004,11 @@ void btrfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
}
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: inode %llu still on the orphan list\n",
(unsigned long long)btrfs_ino(inode));
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
while (1) {
ordered = btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(inode, (u64)-1);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 15:09 Ceph on btrfs 3.4rc Christian Brunner
2012-04-23 7:20 ` Christian Brunner
2012-04-24 15:21 ` Josef Bacik
2012-04-24 16:26 ` Sage Weil
2012-04-24 17:33 ` Josef Bacik
2012-04-24 17:41 ` Neil Horman
2012-04-27 11:02 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-03 14:13 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-03 15:17 ` Josh Durgin
2012-05-03 15:20 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-03 16:38 ` Josh Durgin
2012-05-03 19:49 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-04 20:24 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-09 20:25 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-10 17:40 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-10 20:35 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-11 13:31 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-11 18:33 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-11 19:16 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-14 14:19 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-14 14:20 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-16 19:20 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-17 10:29 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-17 14:43 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-17 15:12 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-17 19:43 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-17 20:54 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-17 21:18 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-18 14:48 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2012-05-18 17:24 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-18 19:01 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-18 20:11 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-21 3:59 ` Miao Xie
2012-05-22 10:29 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-22 17:33 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-23 12:34 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-23 14:12 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-23 15:02 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-23 19:12 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-24 6:03 ` Martin Mailand
2012-05-24 9:37 ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-22 13:31 ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-11 13:46 ` Christian Brunner
2012-04-29 21:09 ` tsuna
2012-04-30 10:28 ` Christian Brunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120518144759.GA1892@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brunner-muc.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@tuxadero.com \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).