From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from magic.merlins.org ([209.81.13.136]:40277 "EHLO mail1.merlins.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752210Ab2EUFWU (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 01:22:20 -0400 Received: from merlin by mail1.merlins.org with local (Exim 4.77 #2) id 1SWL4W-0005uC-5Y for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 22:22:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 22:22:20 -0700 From: Marc MERLIN To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Which kernel is safe to upgrade to for btrfs? Message-ID: <20120521052220.GD15765@merlins.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I upgraded to 3.3.x lately and had no end of problems with btrfs saying my disk was full when it was not. I read that btrfs in 3.3.x had issue and got the recommendation to downgrade, so I went back to 3.2.16 which works for me. Of course, I need a newer kernel for other reasons and I can't tell which branch is safe to upgrade to for btrfs. Have the free space problems been fixed in 3.3.x or is the 3.4.x branch better or should I stay with 3.2.x for safety? Thanks, Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/