From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kreijack@inwind.it
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>,
helmut@hullen.de
Subject: Re: R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:46:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206211346.40683.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE2B576.3030301@libero.it>
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
> >
> >
> >> Now we have the possibility to move the kernel near the modules, and
> >> this could lead some interesting possibility: think about different
> >> linux installations, with an own kernel version and an own modules
> >> version; what are the reasons to put together under /boot different
> >> kernel which potential conflicting names ? de facto standard ?
> >> historical reasons ? Nothing wrong here; but also the idea to moving
> >> the kernel under /lib/modules is not so wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> > No, it is completely, totally and very very seriously wrong.
>
> When a bootloader (and the bioses) will be able to address the whole
> diskS, this will change.. Not now
Why not the other way around? /boot/modules-3.4 or so.
But either way, these are different discussions. H. Peter´s question was,
if I understood correctly, whether to use subvolid or path?
I tend to lean towards subvolid.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 12:02 R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
2012-06-20 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-20 16:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 17:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-20 18:06 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 19:15 ` Helmut Hullen
2012-06-20 20:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 21:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21 5:47 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21 11:46 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2012-06-21 17:05 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21 13:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21 17:05 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21 17:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-20 12:10 Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
2012-06-20 11:51 Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206211346.40683.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
--cc=helmut@hullen.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).