linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <JBacik@fusionio.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: barrier before waitqueue_active
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:11:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802121158.GF2263@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501A5A94.7070307@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:46:44AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 04:25 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > We need an smb_mb() before waitqueue_active to avoid missing wakeups.
> > Before Mitch was hitting a deadlock between the ordered flushers and the
> > transaction commit because the ordered flushers were waiting for more refs
> > and were never woken up, so those smp_mb()'s are the most important.
> > Everything else I added for correctness sake and to avoid getting bitten by
> > this again somewhere else.  Thanks,
> > 
> 
> Hi Josef,
> 
> I'll appreciate a lot if you can add some comments for each memory
> barrier, because not everyone knows why it is used here and there. :)
> 

I'm not going to add comments to all those places, you need a memory barrier in
places you don't have an implicit barrier before you do waitqueue_active because
you could miss somebody being added to the waitqueue, it's just basic
correctness.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-02 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-01 20:25 [PATCH] Btrfs: barrier before waitqueue_active Josef Bacik
2012-08-02  0:21 ` Mitch Harder
2012-08-03 14:43   ` Mitch Harder
2012-08-05  9:18     ` Arne Jansen
2012-08-02 10:46 ` Liu Bo
2012-08-02 12:11   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2012-08-02 13:02     ` David Sterba
2012-08-02 13:01   ` cwillu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120802121158.GF2263@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liub.liubo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).