Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Cc: "Chris L. Mason" <clmason@fusionio.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org" <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race in run_clustered refs
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:37:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120808203710.GE2141@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344455346-7578-1-git-send-email-sensille@gmx.net>

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:49:06PM -0600, Arne Jansen wrote:
> run_clustered_refs runs all delayed refs for one head one by one. During
> the runs, the delayed_refs->lock is released. In this window, the ref_mod
> from the head does not match the sum of all refs below the head. When
> btrfs_lookup_extent_info is run in this window, it gives inconsistent
> results.
> The qgroups patch added code to put delayed refs back, thus opening this
> window very wide.
> This patch assures that head->ref_mod always matches the queued refs, but
> a window still remains where on-disk refs + delayed_refs miss the ref
> currently being run.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index e66dc9a..60d175a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2318,6 +2318,23 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  		ref->in_tree = 0;
>  		rb_erase(&ref->rb_node, &delayed_refs->root);
>  		delayed_refs->num_entries--;
> +		if (locked_ref) {
> +			/*
> +			 * when we play the delayed ref, also correct the
> +			 * ref_mod on head
> +			 */
> +			switch (ref->action) {
> +			case BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF:
> +			case BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_EXTENT:
> +				locked_ref->node.ref_mod -= ref->ref_mod;
> +				break;
> +			case BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF:
> +				locked_ref->node.ref_mod += ref->ref_mod;
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				WARN_ON(1);
> +			}
> +		}
>  		spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
>  
>  		ret = run_one_delayed_ref(trans, root, ref, extent_op,

btrfs_lookup_extent_info takes the mutex on the head before it looks at it's
ref_mod, so it should always be consistent.  Maybe somebody else is messing with
refs and not doing the same thing?  If that's the case we should fix them by
doing the same thing, this isn't a fix.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-08 19:49 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race in run_clustered refs Arne Jansen
2012-08-08 20:37 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2012-08-08 21:23   ` Mitch Harder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120808203710.GE2141@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=clmason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org \
    --cc=sensille@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox