From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fail to mount after first reboot
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:51:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120819145124.GF30735@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5030F92A.4030309@pocock.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3428 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data
> >> on there.
> >>
> >> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again
> >>
> >> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0
> >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
> >> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0,
> >> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> >> dmesg | tail or so
> >
> > With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev
> > scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do
> > this in the initrd (if you've installed its btrfs-progs package).
>
> I'm running Debian, I've just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy
> (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy
> (as it is in the beta phase now)
>
> I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the
> filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn't have an init script
>
> It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules:
> SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs"
> RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}"
>
> LABEL="btrfs_end"
>
> but I'm guessing that isn't any use to my logical volumes that are
> activated early in the boot sequence?
>
> Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes?
Possibly. You may need the "Device mapper uevents" option in the
kernel (CONFIG_DM_UEVENT) to trigger that udev rule when you enable
your VG(s). Not sure if it's available/enabled in your kernel.
> Here is the package version I have:
>
> # dpkg --list | grep btrfs
> ii btrfs-tools 0.19+20120328-7
> Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
That should be fine.
> Here is a more thorough dmesg, since boot, does this suggest the scan
> was invoked? I remember seeing some message about checking for btrfs
> filesystems just after selecting the kernel in grub (root is ext3)
That message was probably grub checking the FS.
> # dmesg | grep btrfs
> [ 40.677505] btrfs: setting nodatacow
> [ 40.677514] btrfs: turning off barriers
> [17216.145092] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17216.145639] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
> [17216.146987] btrfs: failed to read the system array on dm-100
> [17216.147556] btrfs: open_ctree failed
> [17310.978518] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17310.993882] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
> [17598.736657] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 37 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17598.750849] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
No, doesn't look like there were any scan results coming in before
17216.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- In one respect at least, the Martians are a happy people: ---
they have no lawyers.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-19 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-19 14:08 fail to mount after first reboot Daniel Pocock
2012-08-19 14:15 ` Hugo Mills
2012-08-19 14:33 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-08-19 14:51 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2012-08-19 16:02 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-08-20 18:47 ` Daniel Pocock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120819145124.GF30735@carfax.org.uk \
--to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=daniel@pocock.com.au \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).