From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.30]:48299 "EHLO mx1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753173Ab2INNBZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:01:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:01:16 -0400 From: Josef Bacik To: Liu Bo CC: Josef Bacik , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Btrfs: kill obsolete arguments in btrfs_wait_ordered_extents Message-ID: <20120914130116.GL12994@localhost.localdomain> References: <1347613087-3489-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> <1347613087-3489-5-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com> <20120914124516.GK12994@localhost.localdomain> <5053293B.6010400@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <5053293B.6010400@oracle.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:55:23AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > On 09/14/2012 08:45 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:58:07AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > >> nocow_only is now an obsolete argument. > >> > > > > Why is it obsolete, it looks like it's being used to me? Thanks, > > > > All of its callers use 0 as nocow_only now. > Ooooh I saw that wrong, thought the last argument was nocowonly. Thanks, Josef