From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.charite.de ([141.42.206.200]:37197 "EHLO mail2.charite.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752Ab2IQJZQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:25:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3XL1sF4dFPz1tL2 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:15:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postamt.charite.de (postamt.charite.de [141.42.206.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:15:43 +0200 From: Ralf Hildebrandt To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Experiences: Why BTRFS had to yield for ZFS Message-ID: <20120917091543.GC29881@charite.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Casper Bang : > Oracle (Unbreakable) Linux x64 2.6.39-200.29.3.el6uek.x86_64 #1 SMP And the btrfs was that from vanilla 2.6.39 (i.e. over a year old)? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de Campus Benjamin Franklin http://www.charite.de Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT, Abt. Netzwerk fon: +49-30-450.570.155