* btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck
@ 2010-10-29 20:53 Vladi Gergov
2010-10-30 6:55 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vladi Gergov @ 2010-10-29 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
kernel: scratch git repo from today 10.29.10 @ 14:30 PST
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
>>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfs filesystem show
Label: 'das4' uuid: d0e5137f-e5e7-49da-91f6-a9c4e4e72c6f
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1.38TB
devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb
devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.38TB path /dev/sdc
*** Some devices missing
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
>>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc das3/
Password:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
[ 684.577540] device label das4 devid 2 transid 107954 /dev/sdc
[ 684.595150] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
[ 684.595594] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdb
[ 684.604110] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfsck /dev/sdc
btrfsck: volumes.c:1367: btrfs_read_sys_array: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
any help please?
--
,-| Vladi
`-| Gergov
!DSPAM:4ccb39a9191821603519226!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck
2010-10-29 20:53 btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck Vladi Gergov
@ 2010-10-30 6:55 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2010-11-16 21:50 ` Chris Mason
2012-09-17 20:38 ` btrfs raid1 degraded in need of chuck tree rebuild Vladi Gergov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Goffredo Baroncelli @ 2010-10-30 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
On Friday, 29 October, 2010, Vladi Gergov wrote:
> kernel: scratch git repo from today 10.29.10 @ 14:30 PST
> Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
>
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfs filesystem show
> Label: 'das4' uuid: d0e5137f-e5e7-49da-91f6-a9c4e4e72c6f
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1.38TB
> devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb
> devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.38TB path /dev/sdc
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
>
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc das3/
> Password:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
>
> [ 684.577540] device label das4 devid 2 transid 107954 /dev/sdc
> [ 684.595150] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
> [ 684.595594] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdb
> [ 684.604110] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfsck /dev/sdc
> btrfsck: volumes.c:1367: btrfs_read_sys_array: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
>
> any help please?
did you execute
btrfs dev scan
before trying to mount the filesystem ?
> --
>
> ,-| Vladi
> `-| Gergov
>
> !DSPAM:4ccb39a9191821603519226!
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack@inwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck
2010-10-29 20:53 btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck Vladi Gergov
2010-10-30 6:55 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
@ 2010-11-16 21:50 ` Chris Mason
2011-10-10 4:42 ` Larry Reaves
2012-09-17 20:38 ` btrfs raid1 degraded in need of chuck tree rebuild Vladi Gergov
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2010-11-16 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladi Gergov; +Cc: linux-btrfs
Excerpts from Vladi Gergov's message of 2010-10-29 16:53:42 -0400:
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc das3/
> Password:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
>
> [ 684.577540] device label das4 devid 2 transid 107954 /dev/sdc
> [ 684.595150] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
> [ 684.595594] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdb
> [ 684.604110] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfsck /dev/sdc
> btrfsck: volumes.c:1367: btrfs_read_sys_array: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Ok, I dug through this and found the bug responsible for your
unmountable FS. When we're mounted in degraded mode, and we don't have
enough drives available to do raid1,10, we're can use the wrong raid
level for new allocations.
I'm fixing the kernel side so this doesn't happen anymore, but I'll need
to rebuild the chunk tree (and probably a few others) off your good disk to
fix things.
I've got it reproduced here though, so I'll make an fsck that can scan
for the correct trees and fix it for you.
Since you're basically going to be my first external fsck customer, is
there anyway you can do a raw device based backup of the blocks? This
way if I do mess things up we can repeat the experiment.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck
2010-11-16 21:50 ` Chris Mason
@ 2011-10-10 4:42 ` Larry Reaves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Larry Reaves @ 2011-10-10 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Chris Mason <chris.mason <at> oracle.com> writes:
>
> Excerpts from Vladi Gergov's message of 2010-10-29 16:53:42 -0400:
> > >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc das3/
> > Password:
> > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
> > missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> > In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> > dmesg | tail or so
> >
> > [ 684.577540] device label das4 devid 2 transid 107954 /dev/sdc
> > [ 684.595150] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
> > [ 684.595594] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdb
> > [ 684.604110] btrfs: open_ctree failed
> >
> > >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfsck /dev/sdc
> > btrfsck: volumes.c:1367: btrfs_read_sys_array: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
>
> Ok, I dug through this and found the bug responsible for your
> unmountable FS. When we're mounted in degraded mode, and we don't have
> enough drives available to do raid1,10, we're can use the wrong raid
> level for new allocations.
>
> I'm fixing the kernel side so this doesn't happen anymore, but I'll need
> to rebuild the chunk tree (and probably a few others) off your good disk to
> fix things.
>
> I've got it reproduced here though, so I'll make an fsck that can scan
> for the correct trees and fix it for you.
>
> Since you're basically going to be my first external fsck customer, is
> there anyway you can do a raw device based backup of the blocks? This
> way if I do mess things up we can repeat the experiment.
>
> -chris
I'm seeing this same error, uname -a shows:
2.6.38-11-generic
although, my fs went down a month or so ago so it could have been a slightly
earlier Ubuntu kernel. Is this the same issue? Is that very targeted fsck
available somewhere? I've got my replacement disk ready to add, I just need to
get the other 3 mounted. Data and metadata are both raid10. I really need to
start tracking the kernel again :(. Thanks for any help.
-Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* btrfs raid1 degraded in need of chuck tree rebuild
2010-10-29 20:53 btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck Vladi Gergov
2010-10-30 6:55 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2010-11-16 21:50 ` Chris Mason
@ 2012-09-17 20:38 ` Vladi Gergov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vladi Gergov @ 2012-09-17 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: chris.mason
Below is my original post about my fs. Just wondering if anyone knows if
I can at this point get my data back or cut my losses. Is an fsck cable
of getting this fixed close or has my 2 year wait been in vain. Thanks
in advance!
Excerpts from Vladi Gergov's message of 2010-10-29 16:53:42 -0400:
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc das3/
> Password:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
>
> [ 684.577540] device label das4 devid 2 transid 107954 /dev/sdc
> [ 684.595150] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
> [ 684.595594] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdb
> [ 684.604110] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>
> >>> gypsyops @ /mnt > sudo btrfsck /dev/sdc
> btrfsck: volumes.c:1367: btrfs_read_sys_array: Assertion `!(ret)'
> failed.
Ok, I dug through this and found the bug responsible for your
unmountable FS. When we're mounted in degraded mode, and we don't have
enough drives available to do raid1,10, we're can use the wrong raid
level for new allocations.
I'm fixing the kernel side so this doesn't happen anymore, but I'll need
to rebuild the chunk tree (and probably a few others) off your good disk
to
fix things.
I've got it reproduced here though, so I'll make an fsck that can scan
for the correct trees and fix it for you.
Since you're basically going to be my first external fsck customer, is
there anyway you can do a raw device based backup of the blocks? This
way if I do mess things up we can repeat the experiment.
-chris
--
,-| Vladi
`-| Gergov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-17 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-29 20:53 btrfs raid1 degraded does not mount or fsck Vladi Gergov
2010-10-30 6:55 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2010-11-16 21:50 ` Chris Mason
2011-10-10 4:42 ` Larry Reaves
2012-09-17 20:38 ` btrfs raid1 degraded in need of chuck tree rebuild Vladi Gergov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).