From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <JBacik@fusionio.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"dave@jikos.cz" <dave@jikos.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:10:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918131006.GB2272@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5057BEF9.6040507@oracle.com>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 06:23:21PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 01:15 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:56AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> >> This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
> >> As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
> >> The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this
> >> as well.
> >>
> >> Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of
> >> backref walking stuff.
> >>
> >> Here is the basic idea,
> >> o set the writeback ranges started by defragment with flag EXTENT_DEFRAG
> >> o at endio, after we finish updating fs tree, we use backref walking to find
> >> all parents of the ranges and re-link them with the new COWed file layout by
> >> adding corresponding backrefs.
> >>
> >> Originally patch by Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> >
> > I was trying to fixup the rejects on this patch when I noticed there were no
> > tabs, only spaces. Thats not going to work and now I have to go back and make
> > sure none of your other patches did this. Thanks,
> >
> > Josef
> >
>
> I'm quite confused about this, my local part and the email part I received show it is well formed.
>
> There is no spaces, and every time before I send them out, I use checkpatch.pl and make sure
> checkpatch.pl does not complain about anything:
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl ~/Desktop/0002-Btrfs-snapshot-aware-defrag.patch
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 647 lines checked
>
> /home/liubo/Desktop/0002-Btrfs-snapshot-aware-defrag.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
>
> Anyway, I don't know where goes wrong but I'm attaching it for you.
>
Yeah I don't know wtf is going on here, that patch turned out fine. I blame
exchange ;). Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-17 9:58 [PATCH 1/2 v3] Btrfs: use flag EXTENT_DEFRAG for snapshot-aware defrag Liu Bo
2012-09-17 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] Btrfs: " Liu Bo
2012-09-17 10:04 ` Liu Bo
2012-09-17 17:15 ` Josef Bacik
2012-09-18 0:23 ` Liu Bo
2012-09-18 13:10 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2012-09-25 17:39 ` Mitch Harder
2012-09-26 1:07 ` Liu Bo
2012-10-03 14:02 ` Chris Mason
2012-10-04 14:22 ` Liu Bo
2012-10-04 19:40 ` Mitch Harder
2012-10-08 12:18 ` Liu Bo
2012-10-08 13:19 ` Chris Mason
2012-10-08 15:06 ` Mitch Harder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120918131006.GB2272@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dave@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).