From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.30]:44678 "EHLO mx1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404Ab2JBOcg (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:32:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:32:32 -0400 From: Josef Bacik To: David Sterba CC: Josef Bacik , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: try to avoid doing a search in btrfs_next_leaf Message-ID: <20121002143232.GE2370@localhost.localdomain> References: <1348516979-2343-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> <20121002142538.GV14582@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20121002142538.GV14582@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 08:25:38AM -0600, David Sterba wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:02:59PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h > > @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ struct btrfs_path { > > unsigned int skip_locking:1; > > unsigned int leave_spinning:1; > > unsigned int search_commit_root:1; > > + unsigned int shecantgoanyfarthercapt:1; > > so you did not make it to LWN's quote of the week, can you please rename > it to something sensible? > I don't see what's unsensible about it. Josef