From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.humilis.net ([82.95.169.224]:59658 "EHLO panda.humilis.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753034Ab2LDI5M (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 03:57:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:57:09 +0100 From: Sander To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sw=E2mi?= Petaramesh Cc: Jan Schmidt , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Example of BTRFS uglyssima performance : Bitcoin Message-ID: <20121204085709.GA18531@panda> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net References: <50BC92F6.6050404@petaramesh.org> <50BCCB85.9010905@jan-o-sch.net> <50BCDA36.1050900@petaramesh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <50BCDA36.1050900@petaramesh.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Swâmi Petaramesh wrote (ao): > But I've been using pretty *anything over LUKS/LVM for years, and I've > never notice it cause any (noticeable to the point of becoming annoying) > system slowdown, whatever tasks I may have processed in such setups > (including servers, big databases, compilations, NAS, etc...) If your system is stable, you could also consider running bitcoin with eatmydata. Sander