From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, sander@humilis.net,
Sylvain Alain <d2racing911@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question about btrfs snapshot delay and rm -rf delay
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 20:37:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206193748.GA25875@panda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201212061955.11919.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Martin Steigerwald wrote (ao):
> Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander:
> > > Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> > > > Hi, right now I own this SSD :
> > > >
> > > > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
> > >
> > > > Also, this is my /etc/fstab
> > > > /dev/sda3 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime,defaults
> > > > /dev/sda1 /boot/efi vfat noauto,defaults
> > > > /dev/sda4 / btrfs
> > >
> > > SSDs are sensitive to partitioning. Easiest is not to partition at all.
> >
> > Huh? How so?
> >
> > My Intel SSD 320 is partitioned and uses LVM in the biggest partition
> > and is still just fine after 19 month. Media wearout indicator still at 100
> > (of 100).
>
> Or did you indirectly refer to partition alignment?
Yes I did, I meant sensitive performance wise. I think your Intel 320
will survive just fine, but partition missalignment gives the controller
quite a bit more work to do.
Sander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 4:56 Question about btrfs snapshot delay and rm -rf delay Sylvain Alain
2012-12-06 5:14 ` Rock Lee
2012-12-06 6:31 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-12-06 12:52 ` Sylvain Alain
2012-12-06 12:59 ` Sander
2012-12-06 18:52 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 18:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 19:37 ` Sander [this message]
2012-12-06 18:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-07 13:48 Sylvain Alain
2012-12-08 11:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121206193748.GA25875@panda \
--to=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=d2racing911@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).