* no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? @ 2012-12-12 22:42 Zach Brown 2012-12-12 22:51 ` Hugo Mills 2012-12-14 18:04 ` Piotr Pawłow 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Zach Brown @ 2012-12-12 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs It looks like it's been a bit more than two months since http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git;a=summary saw patches from the list. Am I looking in the wrong place for the btrfs-progs upstream? - z ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 22:42 no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? Zach Brown @ 2012-12-12 22:51 ` Hugo Mills 2012-12-12 23:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2012-12-14 18:04 ` Piotr Pawłow 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Hugo Mills @ 2012-12-12 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zach Brown; +Cc: linux-btrfs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1098 bytes --] On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > It looks like it's been a bit more than two months since > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git;a=summary > > saw patches from the list. > > Am I looking in the wrong place for the btrfs-progs upstream? Two things: 1) That tree is generally only ever updated for pull requests to Linus during the merge window. Would that it were otherwise, but I suspect that... 2) ... you may want to know about josef's btrfs-next tree: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories#Integration_repository_.28btrfs-next.29 It's regarded as fairly unstable, so only run it on systems for testing purposes (or if josef tells you it's OK and will fix one of your problems). Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle, --- and quick to anger. [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 22:51 ` Hugo Mills @ 2012-12-12 23:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2012-12-12 23:41 ` Zach Brown 2012-12-12 23:51 ` Hugo Mills 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2012-12-12 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hugo Mills, Zach Brown, linux-btrfs On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > Two things: > > 1) That tree is generally only ever updated for pull requests to Linus > during the merge window. Would that it were otherwise, but I > suspect that... > > 2) ... you may want to know about josef's btrfs-next tree: > > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories#Integration_repository_.28btrfs-next.29 > > It's regarded as fairly unstable, so only run it on systems for > testing purposes (or if josef tells you it's OK and will fix one of > your problems). > I think Zach was asking about the userspace tools, not the kernel module. That link points to the kernel module integration branches, and the link above that on the wiki page about btrfs-progs integration hasn't had commits in the last 6 months, AFAICT. I've been concerned about the status btrfs-progs maintenance myself. I've seen quite a few obvious bugs about btrfs-progs on this list in the past months—most of them with patches. However, I don't see them enter any upstream git repositories. Cheers, -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 23:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2012-12-12 23:41 ` Zach Brown 2012-12-13 14:56 ` Chris Mason 2012-12-12 23:51 ` Hugo Mills 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Zach Brown @ 2012-12-12 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nirbheek Chauhan; +Cc: Hugo Mills, linux-btrfs On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:50:54AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > > Two things: *nod* > I think Zach was asking about the userspace tools, not the kernel > module. But yes, I was asking about -progs :). - z ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 23:41 ` Zach Brown @ 2012-12-13 14:56 ` Chris Mason 2012-12-13 19:50 ` Zach Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2012-12-13 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zach Brown; +Cc: Nirbheek Chauhan, Hugo Mills, linux-btrfs On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:41:50PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:50:54AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > > > Two things: > > *nod* > > > I think Zach was asking about the userspace tools, not the kernel > > module. > > But yes, I was asking about -progs :). Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes onto master. -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-13 14:56 ` Chris Mason @ 2012-12-13 19:50 ` Zach Brown 2012-12-13 21:06 ` Chris Mason 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Zach Brown @ 2012-12-13 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Mason, Nirbheek Chauhan, Hugo Mills, linux-btrfs On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been > trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes > onto master. Thanks. I was asking because it's pretty annoying to go through patchwork to see if someone else has already fixed bugs in the git tree. This happened to me when our distro package infrastructure freaked out at btrfs-progs (-fno-strict-aliasing, int/ptr differences, static code analysis lighting up a like a christmas tree). Would it be fair to say that the project is accepting applications for an active btrfs-progs maintainer? :) - z ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-13 19:50 ` Zach Brown @ 2012-12-13 21:06 ` Chris Mason 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2012-12-13 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zach Brown; +Cc: Chris Mason, Nirbheek Chauhan, Hugo Mills, linux-btrfs On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been > > trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes > > onto master. > > Thanks. > > I was asking because it's pretty annoying to go through patchwork to see > if someone else has already fixed bugs in the git tree. This happened > to me when our distro package infrastructure freaked out at btrfs-progs > (-fno-strict-aliasing, int/ptr differences, static code analysis > lighting up a like a christmas tree). > > Would it be fair to say that the project is accepting applications for > an active btrfs-progs maintainer? :) Well, the problem is the active maintainer is busy piling in other features. But yeah, I need to pull in the fixes, sorry. -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 23:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2012-12-12 23:41 ` Zach Brown @ 2012-12-12 23:51 ` Hugo Mills 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Hugo Mills @ 2012-12-12 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nirbheek Chauhan; +Cc: Zach Brown, linux-btrfs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1931 bytes --] On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:50:54AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > > Two things: > > > > 1) That tree is generally only ever updated for pull requests to Linus > > during the merge window. Would that it were otherwise, but I > > suspect that... > > > > 2) ... you may want to know about josef's btrfs-next tree: > > > > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories#Integration_repository_.28btrfs-next.29 > > > > It's regarded as fairly unstable, so only run it on systems for > > testing purposes (or if josef tells you it's OK and will fix one of > > your problems). > > > > I think Zach was asking about the userspace tools, not the kernel > module. That link points to the kernel module integration branches, > and the link above that on the wiki page about btrfs-progs integration > hasn't had commits in the last 6 months, AFAICT. > > I've been concerned about the status btrfs-progs maintenance myself. > I've seen quite a few obvious bugs about btrfs-progs on this list in > the past months—most of them with patches. However, I don't see them > enter any upstream git repositories. D'oh. It's been a long day... Must learn to read more carefully. Sorry. I've been a combination of ill and busy (mostly busy) for the last umpteen months, which is why the integration repo hasn't been updated. The main -progs repo doesn't get a whole lot of love, even when I've managed to do an integration run and hold it together for long enough for Chris to pick it up. Patches do eventually get in, but it's usually on a 6+-month cycle. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- IMPROVE YOUR ORGANISMS!! -- Subject line of spam email --- [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-12 22:42 no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? Zach Brown 2012-12-12 22:51 ` Hugo Mills @ 2012-12-14 18:04 ` Piotr Pawłow 2012-12-14 18:31 ` Hendrik Friedel 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Piotr Pawłow @ 2012-12-14 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs Hello, > It looks like it's been a bit more than two months since > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git;a=summary Try git://github.com/josefbacik/btrfs-progs I just spent whole day debugging btrfs-restore, fixing signed / unsigned comparisons, adding another mirror retry, only to find out it is all already done in this repository. D'oh! Regards ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? 2012-12-14 18:04 ` Piotr Pawłow @ 2012-12-14 18:31 ` Hendrik Friedel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Hendrik Friedel @ 2012-12-14 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Piotr Pawłow; +Cc: linux-btrfs Hello, > Try git://github.com/josefbacik/btrfs-progs > > I just spent whole day debugging btrfs-restore, fixing signed / unsigned > comparisons, adding another mirror retry, only to find out it is all > already done in this repository. D'oh! But it has no --repair option. Greetings, Hendrik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-14 18:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-12 22:42 no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? Zach Brown 2012-12-12 22:51 ` Hugo Mills 2012-12-12 23:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2012-12-12 23:41 ` Zach Brown 2012-12-13 14:56 ` Chris Mason 2012-12-13 19:50 ` Zach Brown 2012-12-13 21:06 ` Chris Mason 2012-12-12 23:51 ` Hugo Mills 2012-12-14 18:04 ` Piotr Pawłow 2012-12-14 18:31 ` Hendrik Friedel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).