From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.31]:56222 "EHLO mx2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755610Ab2LMVGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:06:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:06:28 -0500 From: Chris Mason To: Zach Brown CC: Chris Mason , Nirbheek Chauhan , Hugo Mills , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: no activity in kernel.org btrfs-progs git repo? Message-ID: <20121213210628.GB27308@shiny> References: <20121212224214.GA9195@lenny.home.zabbo.net> <20121212225157.GD19051@carfax.org.uk> <20121212234150.GB9195@lenny.home.zabbo.net> <20121213145610.GA12369@shiny> <20121213195040.GE9195@lenny.home.zabbo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20121213195040.GE9195@lenny.home.zabbo.net> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been > > trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes > > onto master. > > Thanks. > > I was asking because it's pretty annoying to go through patchwork to see > if someone else has already fixed bugs in the git tree. This happened > to me when our distro package infrastructure freaked out at btrfs-progs > (-fno-strict-aliasing, int/ptr differences, static code analysis > lighting up a like a christmas tree). > > Would it be fair to say that the project is accepting applications for > an active btrfs-progs maintainer? :) Well, the problem is the active maintainer is busy piling in other features. But yeah, I need to pull in the fixes, sorry. -chris