From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix memory leak on extent map after fsync
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:38:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125013805.GB11440@liubo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130124164433.GE2349@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:33AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:49:21AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> > During fsync, we put the changed parts(i.e. extent map) into the log tree,
> > and we ship these parts from a list of modified_extents to a local list
> > to process, of course, we must increment the refs of the extent maps to
> > avoid it from getting evicted from cache.
> >
> > The problem is
> > we don't hold the tree writer lock all the time of iterating the local list,
> > and it is possible that other threads hack in and delete the extent map from
> > the local list silently. So we'll end up with memory leak here.
> >
> > I hit this when testing xfstest 274 with mount options 'autodefrag,compress=zlib'.
> >
> > With this fix, the memory leak has gone away.
>
> This isn't going to work, we use the LOGGING flag to make sure the em isn't
> merged as well. Thanks,
A quick grep shows,
1 16 fs/btrfs/extent_map.h <<GLOBAL>>
#define EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING 4
2 406 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c <<remove_extent_mapping>>
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, &em->flags))
3 3403 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c <<btrfs_log_changed_extents>>
set_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, &em->flags);
4 3413 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c <<btrfs_log_changed_extents>>
clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, &em->flags);
how does the flag avoid merging em?
Seems we lost the check.
static int mergable_maps(struct extent_map *prev, struct extent_map *next)
{
if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED, &prev->flags))
return 0;
/*
* don't merge compressed extents, we need to know their
* actual size
*/
if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_COMPRESSED, &prev->flags))
return 0;
...
}
thanks,
liubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 14:49 [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: add leak debug for extent map Liu Bo
2013-01-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix memory leak on extent map after fsync Liu Bo
2013-01-24 16:44 ` Josef Bacik
2013-01-25 1:38 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2013-01-25 2:23 ` Liu Bo
2013-01-24 16:52 ` Josef Bacik
2013-01-08 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: add leak debug for extent map Zach Brown
2013-01-10 2:05 ` Liu Bo
2013-01-10 11:54 ` David Sterba
2013-01-10 13:11 ` Liu Bo
2013-01-11 15:31 ` David Sterba
2013-01-10 17:06 ` Zach Brown
2013-01-11 8:45 ` Liu Bo
2013-01-11 20:54 ` Zach Brown
2013-01-13 12:18 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130125013805.GB11440@liubo \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox