From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from len.romanrm.net ([176.31.121.172]:52458 "EHLO len.romanrm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753470Ab3AaEK7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:10:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:10:55 +0600 From: Roman Mamedov To: Ian Kumlien Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Move btrfsck in to the btrfs command Message-ID: <20130131101055.44c138d5@natsu> In-Reply-To: <1359500633-7219-1-git-send-email-pomac@demius.net> References: <1359500633-7219-1-git-send-email-pomac@demius.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/vi+P6S8aZBscGfkKsUOirl="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Sig_/vi+P6S8aZBscGfkKsUOirl= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:03:52 +0100 Ian Kumlien wrote: > This patch moves btrfsck in to "btrfs fsck". Does the "...fs fs.." combination look less than ideally beautiful to anyone else? That's "Filesystem" abbreviated two times right there. Who can use an ATM Machine? Someone who knows a PIN Number. Also it's a complete clstrfck of nine consonants, with no vowels. How about "btrfs check"? --=20 With respect, Roman ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Stallman had a printer, with code he could not see. So he began to tinker, and set the software free." --Sig_/vi+P6S8aZBscGfkKsUOirl= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEJ7s8ACgkQTLKSvz+PZwijEQCePJ/1z0PWy0Ylb9tGZJIFTafP JjwAnRXLoo+eMTNPHx0Y+o2qpf1Zs4sd =2KKV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vi+P6S8aZBscGfkKsUOirl=--