From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dkim1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.53]:44634 "EHLO dkim1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758539Ab3BTO0Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:26:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.fusionio.com (unknown [10.101.1.160]) by dkim1.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727C87C0401 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:26:15 -0700 (MST) Received: from mail1.int.fusionio.com (mail1.int.fusionio.com [10.101.1.21]) by mx1.fusionio.com with ESMTP id Od6q95FN0Cqv5ixg (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:26:14 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:26:12 -0500 From: Josef Bacik To: Subject: LAST CALL FOR BTRFS-NEXT Message-ID: <20130220142612.GA2062@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, If you have patches in btrfs-next, make sure they are the right ones so we don't have to rebase and repull and merge and all that crap for this merge window. If I'm missing stuff that's fine, I can throw that on top, but you need to make sure I have the right versions of stuff already in the tree so I can rebase it _now_ rather than trying to figure out how to fix it later. Thanks! Josef