From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:44086 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933257Ab3BTOnR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:43:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:42:02 +0800 From: Liu Bo To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LAST CALL FOR BTRFS-NEXT Message-ID: <20130220144201.GD4941@liubo.jp.oracle.com> Reply-To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com References: <20130220142612.GA2062@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130220142612.GA2062@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:26:12AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > Hello, > > If you have patches in btrfs-next, make sure they are the right ones so we don't > have to rebase and repull and merge and all that crap for this merge window. If > I'm missing stuff that's fine, I can throw that on top, but you need to make > sure I have the right versions of stuff already in the tree so I can rebase it > _now_ rather than trying to figure out how to fix it later. Thanks! Hi Josef, Thanks for your maintaining work. Could you please pull this into btrfs-next? I don't see new bug reports after this version. - Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2058911/ thanks, liubo > > Josef > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html