From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Marios Titas <redneb8888@gmail.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: do not change inode flags in rename
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:11:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130226001116.GA8524@liubo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130225185647.GB2434@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:56:47PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 09:04:42PM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> > Before we forced to change a file's NOCOW and COMPRESS flag due to
> > the parent directory's, but this ends up a bad idea, because it
> > confuses end users a lot about file's NOCOW status, eg. if someone
> > change a file to NOCOW via 'chattr' and then rename it in the current
> > directory which is without NOCOW attribute, the file will lose the
> > NOCOW flag silently.
> >
> > This diables 'change flags in rename', so from now on we'll only
> > inherit flags from the parent directory on creation stage while in
> > other places we can use 'chattr' to set NOCOW or COMPRESS flags.
> >
>
> I'm of the mind we definitely shouldn't drop flags we've set previously, but I
> think we should also inherit any flags we have set on the directory, so if we
> move a file into a NOCOW directory we should inherit the flag. I'm not married
> to the idea, but it seems to make the most sense to me. Thanks,
>
> Josef
Hi Josef,
(Said in another thread)
I'm ok with either one, but...
from some reports on the list, end users are more likely to control, use chattr
files by themselves, inheriting flags via moving a file to a new directory is
indeed not very welcomed.
So for practical use, I assume that it's fairly enough to inherit flags only on
creation?
thanks,
liubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 4:04 [PATCH] Btrfs: do not change inode flags in rename Liu Bo
2013-02-25 10:50 ` David Sterba
2013-02-25 14:41 ` Liu Bo
2013-02-25 18:56 ` Josef Bacik
2013-02-26 0:11 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2013-02-26 12:33 ` David Sterba
2013-02-26 14:25 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130226001116.GA8524@liubo \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=redneb8888@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).