From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Cc: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@fajar.net>,
"linux-btrfs" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Fleetwood <mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com>,
Suman C <schakrava@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lvm volume like support
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:42:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201302270942.03347.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130227100558.37d86d82@natsu>
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:23:23 +1100
>
> "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@fajar.net> wrote:
> > Not to mention the hassle in accessing the data if it resides on a
> > partition inside the file (e.g. you need losetup + kpartx to access it,
> > and you must remember to do the reverse when you're finished with it).
> >
> >
> >
> > In zfsonlinux it's very easy to do so since a zvol is treated pretty
> > much like a disk, and whenever there's a partition inside a zvol, a
> > coressponding device noed is also created automatically.
>
> So I'd say what you (we) need is a generic Linux kernel framework that
> would allow treating any regular file pretty much like a disk. Not some
> filesystem-specific block device emulation kludge.
>
> Btw some years ago there was a patchset adding proper automatic partition
> support to 'loop'; but it seems like that went nowhere, and I have no
> idea why something this useful did not end up being added into the
> mainline kernel.
Are you sure about the partition support? I thought something related to
loop partition support has gone into some not so recent kernel.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 23:35 lvm volume like support Suman C
2013-02-26 0:59 ` Mike Fleetwood
2013-02-26 1:46 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2013-02-26 5:35 ` Suman C
2013-02-26 5:48 ` Remco Hosman - Yerf-IT
2013-02-26 5:57 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-02-26 6:25 ` Suman C
2013-02-26 6:28 ` Remco Hosman - Yerf IT
2013-02-26 6:37 ` Alex Elsayed
2013-02-26 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-19 18:13 ` Andy Grover
2013-02-26 10:30 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-02-27 2:23 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2013-02-27 4:05 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-02-27 8:42 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2013-02-27 9:17 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-02-27 8:50 ` Alex Elsayed
2013-02-27 9:57 ` Alex Elsayed
2013-02-27 10:12 ` Alex Elsayed
2013-04-08 12:01 ` David Sterba
2013-04-11 12:29 ` David Sterba
2013-03-02 6:24 ` Marcus Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201302270942.03347.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=list@fajar.net \
--cc=mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com \
--cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
--cc=schakrava@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).