From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dkim1.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.53]:41494 "EHLO dkim1.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751829Ab3C0UwQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:52:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.fusionio.com (unknown [10.101.1.160]) by dkim1.fusionio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE867C0682 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:52:16 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:52:12 -0400 From: Josef Bacik To: =?utf-8?B?U3rFkXRzIMOBa29z?= CC: Josef Bacik , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Kernel bug on mismatching generation_v2 in inode.c:835 Message-ID: <20130327205212.GM28030@localhost.localdomain> References: <20130327183325.GK28030@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:17:56PM -0600, Szőts Ákos wrote: > I ran two different versions of btrfsck on the partition. > > The first one was shipped with openSUSE 12.3, kernel 3.7. > This is the original tool with which the partition was checked: > http://paste.opensuse.org/74569620 > > The second one is from your tree (maybe it's newer): > http://filebin.ca/bfbwJezYwCV/btrfsck-v2.txt > BTW if the fsck doesn't fix your problem don't despair, I'm hacking up another option for btrfs-image to just walk the trees themselves and scrape everything so I can have a full image from you and then I'll be able to fix fsck to fix your file system. Thanks, Josef